A Django site.
June 24, 2008

Doran Barton
fozzmoo
Fozzolog
» Review: Samsung Instinct as a replacement smartphone

I've had a Palm Treo 700p for a couple years and a Treo 650p before that, both with Sprint as a wireless carrier. The 700p acted up a few months ago, so I took it into a Sprint repair center. They promptly wiped it, upgraded the firmware and gave it back to me as "fixed." Only, it wasn't fixed. I'm not sure, but I think the firmware they upgraded me to wasn't intended to ever run on a 700p, but I'm not sure. As a result, the phone has kinda-sorta worked since then.

I've read on Engadget about a new phone exclusive to Sprint from Samsung called the Instinct. At first glance, it looks eerily similar to an Apple iPhone, but as I read more about it, it looked like it might be a good fit for me.

Boy, was I wrong.

instinct-250x325.jpg

Before I go into some specifics, let me just say that Samsung and Sprint can easily save this phone. All they need to do is open it up just a little more and listen to the "corporate" users.

What I liked

One thing I liked about the Instinct is that it does not run Windows Mobile. I've avoided Win-Mo on principle, but have helped other people with problems on Win-Mo devices and have experienced the frustration that is running Win-Mo. Using a Palm Treo vs. a Win-Mo Treo is the difference between night and day. One operates like cold tar (and has a lower video resolution) while the other is relatively stable and snappy.

The Instict is an awesome phone, it just isn't quite a "smartphone" and definitely isn't a geek's phone.

The "haptic feedback" is very cool: The phone generates a mild vibration when you touch an active icon on the touchscreen, thereby giving you physical feedback that you've activated a button or other onscreen feature. This goes a long way toward alleviating the "flatness" problem a lot of touchscreen devices have.

The Instinct has a very nice GPS navigation program that plots routes and gives you turn-by-turn directions. This is an amazing feature for a mobile handset that nets you $129 after rebate.

The sound quality of the phone is very, very good, both as a handset and as a speakerphone. Kudos to Samsung for that.

The web browser is "okay." It's better than the Blazer browser on the Treo, but it's not quite what it wants to be which is a browser that people will want to use more frequently than just when they're desperate for something off the Web.

The camera (still and video software is included) is, by far, the best cell phone camera I've ever used. Wow! It lacks a flash, but performed pretty dang well in low-light.

The Instinct has "visual voicemail" which is bound to become a de facto feature on new phones moving forward. Very cool.

Plugging the phone into a USB port on my laptop running Linux worked well. Linux detected a USB mass storage device and let me mount it. If I understand correctly, it's just acting as a card reader for the mini-SD card. This gives you access to all the non-phone media like pictures, movies, and music.

What I really didn't like

E-mail was a dealbreaker. The Samsung/Sprint e-mail client software tried to be very accomodating and provides wizards for setting up mobile e-mail accounts for popular webmail sites like AOL, Hotmail, Yahoo!, and GMail, but doesn't quite deliver as more than a basic e-mail client in any other regard. It does let you set up multiple POP or IMAP accounts and supports SSL-encrypted access for privacy wheres supported. However, I don't believe it's a true IMAP client because it only displays 25 of your most recent messages (I think you can bump that up to 100 in the settings) and doesn't let you access IMAP folders other than Sent, Inbox, and Trash.

Browsing HTML e-mail messages is lame because, while the Instict does take a stab at parsing the HTML, it only displays the text and does not give you any links which you can click on to view on the phone's browser.

E-mail attachment support is nonexistent.

While I don't care, the Instinct only offers a bare minimum support for Exchange users via Outlook Web Access and doesn't sync with Exchange (or anything else, for that matter).

Speaking of synchronization, Sprint does offer a remote sync feature that let's you store your contacts and other data on a remote server. The benefit of this is that if your phone is stolen or broken, you still have access to your address book. Additionally, Sprint provides a web-based facility for you to manage your contacts.

I thought this was going to be cool. I could just export my contacts from KDE's address book and import them into Sprint's web facility and, voila, all the contacts I've had on my Treo would instantly be available to me on the Instinct.

The Sprint import facility had instructions for Outlook users to export their contacts as a CSV file and even went as far as to indicate what column names were valid and would be recognized by the import routine. I tweaked the CSV file my system generated to match the column headings Sprint wanted. The import process took several minutes and then told me it couldn't import anything. Game over.

The in-phone address book is terribly lacking. For starters, there's 's no way to store a company name with an entry, only last name or first name.

Text messaging was... okay, but cumbersome.

Typing text on the Instinct is not too bad, but has some serious caveats. While the text entry routine provides spellcheck on-the-fly, it doesn't provide spelling or grammar correction on the fly at all. That seems odd considering just about every phone I've used the last ten years or so has had that. It should at least auto-conjugate and insert apostrophes when I type "cant" or "doesnt." Nope, won't do it. Even a lone "i" surrounded by whitespace on either side remains lower case. It's smart enough to capitalize the first letter after punctuation and it will highlight mispelled words (including my un-conjugated conjunctions). Tapping on a mispelled word will offer suggestions, but this is a time-consuming affair!

I registered as a developer on Sprint's Developer website hoping to create some cool third-party apps for the Instinct -- fill in some of the gaps, but got discouraged rather quickly.

In one of the developer forum posts, a developer asks, "Is there a desktop USB SDK for access to the Calendar, Notes or any other built-in data? " A Samsung developer replied: "There is no USB SDK/API supported on the Instinct."

The Sprint sales representative who helped me purchase the Instinct told me, up front, the Instinct did not support tethering so I could not use it as a wireless modem for a laptop. I thought I'd investigate that a little further before I gave up on it -- see if it looked like it would be forthcoming as an official capability or as a third-party software add-on, but it doesn't look good.

End result?

I'll be taking the Instinct back to Sprint in the next day and will either purchase a Palm Centro instead or give their technicians another shot at fixing my 700p.

Samsung and Sprint need to assign some hardware interaction and usability people to this phone. Not only are most of the applications painfully minimalistic and basic, they're not as easy to use as they could or should be. 

Again, this could be a good smartphone for Sprint if they give more attention to the needs of "professional" users.

June 19, 2008
» Extend Your Battery Life With Powertop

If you use a Linux laptop and have not heard of PowerTop you really need to keep reading!  This is a fantastic tool for extending your battery life written and published by Intel.  I use it constantly on long flights and my battery lasts long enough for a cross-country flight.

Installing Powertop

PowerTop is available in the Ubuntu repositories so its a really easy installation:

sudo aptitude install powertop

Once you’ve got it installed start things up using:

sudo powertop

This application will scan your machine for 5 seconds and then tell you which hardware or application is causing the most drain on your machine.  The best part about it is that it’ll offer you suggestions along with shortcut keys to disable the feature or hardware in order to conserve power!

Some of the common things that powertop suggests disabling on my machine are bluetooth, wireless and add-on storage (cdrom, usb-devices, etc).  Disabling these few things can extend my battery up to an hour (depending on the software I’m running, of course).

I really suggest checking out powertop for any laptop user.  It should be part of your base installation setup.  What luck have you had with powertop?  How long can you extend your battery life?

Related

March 4, 2008

Phil Windley
pjw
Phil Windley's Technometria
» Sectored Wi-Fi Architecture

Xirrus Wi-Fi array controller
Xirrus Wi-Fi array controller
(click to enlarge)

O'Reilly is using one of these Xirrus Wi-Fi arrays and so far, I've got to say I'm impressed. The bandwidth has been great with none of the traditional conference wi-fi problems we all have learned to live with The picture is of the operational array on the light truss in front of the stage. Looks much cooler in real life since all the lights are blinking! According to the Web site, the XS16, which is what we've got here, can deliver up to 864Mbps of bandwidth. Very cool.

Tags: etech etech08 wireless

January 10, 2008

Phil Windley
pjw
Phil Windley's Technometria
» How the iPhone is Changing the Wireless Industry

Apple iPhone
Apple iPhone
(click to enlarge)

The latest issue of Wired Magazine has a great article on the iPhone: The Untold Story: How the iPhone Blew Up the Wireless Industry. Very interesting behind the scenes details and analysis. Here's the summary:

The hosannas greeting the iPhone were so overwhelming it was easy to ignore its imperfections. The initial price of $599 was too high (it has been lowered to $399). The phone runs on AT&T;'s poky EDGE network. Users can't perform email searches or record video. The browser won't run programs written in Java or Flash.

But none of that mattered. The iPhone cracked open the carrier-centric structure of the wireless industry and unlocked a host of benefits for consumers, developers, manufacturers --- and potentially the carriers themselves. Consumers get an easy-to-use handheld computer. And, as with the advent of the PC, the iPhone is sparking a wave of development that will make it even more powerful. In February, Jobs will release a developer's kit so that anyone can write programs for the device.

From The Untold Story: How the iPhone Blew Up the Wireless Industry
Referenced Thu Jan 10 2008 08:53:16 GMT-0700 (MST)

Last month a Net Applications survey put iPhone browsing share--that is, how many pageviews on the 'Net are from an iPhone--is at 0.09%. That may seem like a small number, but keep in mind that that means that almost one our of every thousand pages viewed on the 'Net is seen on an iPhone. That's 50% more than all Windows CE devices combined--which have been on sale for a decade.

A ComputerWorld blog by Seth Weintraub put it this way:

Obviously this doesn't translate to handset marketshare. We know there are much more than 20 million Windows Mobile devices out there. The reason that Apple's browser marketshare is higher while its unit sales are much lower is explained easily by the oft-touted Mobile Safari browser and unlimited AT&T; data plan. No guilt, pleasurable, full-browser surfing.

It's not just just Windows Mobile that is getting killed by iPhone. PSP, Playstation and WebTV combined don't even come close. The Sidekick, also, only has 1/5 of the browser marketshare. Symbian? About 1/10th.

And it doesn't stop there. Desktop platforms are starting to come into the iPhone's blast radius. Windows 95 has less than a quarter of the marketshare of the iPhone. And all of the Linux variants combined, just over five times (.57%) the market. Broken out over Red Hat, Novel, Ubuntu, etc, someone is losing to the iPhone right now. At this rate, the iPhone/iPod platform should be the third largest computing platform by the end of next year. Remember, the iPod touch is only three months old. Oh, and it is Christmas.

Not a bad first five months for Apple's new handheld OSX devices.

From iPhone browsing marketshare closes in on .1% | Computerworld Blogs
Referenced Thu Jan 10 2008 08:42:30 GMT-0700 (MST)

I'll say. These numbers are evidence of the fact that the iPhone is a better mobile browser than anything that's come before. This despite the slow network (and, frankly, the slow browser).

Imagine what these numbers would look like if the iPhone were a business device!

Tags: iphone apple wireless

July 30, 2007

Jeremy Robb
scothoser
Scothoser's Corner
» Google and the Open Wireless Networks Goal

This morning, as I drove 10 miles out of my way to avoid an accident that wasn't reported on traffic radio (which is a gripe for another day), I tuned into NPR for Morning Addition. I love public radio, because the news is probably the least biased that I have ever heard (yet still very biased). It's refreshing to hear about events that most major news groups would see beneath them, such as the existence of Rose Shows.

This particular morning they had This article on Google's efforts to urge the FCC to open wireless networks to more competition outside of the "Big Four". The reason behind it is sound: In the wake of a possible failure of the Net Neutrality situation, Google wants to secure the future of wireless networks by making their applications, search engines, etc. available for everyone who want to use it. It's a boost for business in a growing market, and provides good PR for Google.

Another really good reason I heard Google mention on Friday was the need for real competition within the Wireless Network community. Right now, you have the Big Four: Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T.; There are other, smaller networks, but they are marginalized by these big competitors. A lot of it has to do with existing network presence, limited radio bandwidth availability because of funding, and so on. Sound familiar? Ma Bell had the same setup, and continues to have the same setup with service monopolies in areas where they own the infrastructure.

So what's the answer? provide a public infrastructure. Google is trying to convince the FCC of this through their auctions. It would force the winning bidders to provide access to these air waves to allow other networks to utilize them. Hence better network support, better customer service, better consumer experiences.

Sounds very similar to the arguments that initiated the UTOPIA project in various Utah cities. And the same arguments are being made against Google's initiative: Bidding will not go as high, and the FCC will take a hit on how much money they will make, ultimately hurting the tax payer in the short run. So Google offered the answer: Guarantee a bid that will be attractive to the FCC and make the potential loss go away. The same attempt was done by various businessmen in Salt Lake to convince the Salt Lake Council to go with UTOPIA.

I wish Google success in this endeavor. Perhaps they can create a change in the wireless community that will make me want to have a cell phone. Perhaps they can convince an increasingly consumer-hostile business to release their strangle-hold on the market to allow for real competition to emerge, and by doing so provide an air of innovation that will make wireless a network worth innovating in.