Utah Open Source Planet

Jesse Stay
obfuscated, Uncle_Jesse
Stay N' Alive » OSS

» telephone.png

It all started with this post today. A supposed “employee ‘close to the deal’” told blogger, Zach Klein (who doesn’t seem to allow comments on his blog) that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Family History division had made an unsolicited bid to purchase Facebook. Nothing else - no other background, no other resources to confirm the deal. Soon after, ValleyWag, the first to the scene and first large blog to publish anything about it, was blogging rumors they are well known for spreading. Soon after, Venturebeat and the Industry Standard were blogging about it, quoting Brady Brim-DeForest, who ironically was claiming this as news, not a rumor at all - I’m unaware of where he got it, but his news broke after Valleywag’s. TheInquisitr, while I’m sure had no ill-intentions, even made fun of the manner with some very radical and somewhat inaccurate claims that I know have offended some members of the LDS Faith that read the blog. The blogosphere seems to be a mess today in regards to regard for religion, faith, and respect for one another’s belief. It appears the LDS Church has become the punch-line of the blogosphere’s Jokes and I’m getting really tired of it.

Now, let’s talk about rumors. The blogosphere is known for spreading rumors - I’ve hated them from the get-go, but let’s face it, it’s a part of many blogs out there, and it may not be going away any time soon. (I think I could do an entire post about rumors in and of itself) I expect an occasional rumor about Microsoft trying to buy Yahoo, or Facebook employees leaving the company because they are mad with Executives, or even a crazy one like the iPhone 2.0 coming with 2 cameras and iChat video support. Frankly, I never share those (well, rarely), but they are fun to read because, well, they’re funny. But rumors like an entire Faith buying a huge company like Facebook are ridiculous, unfounded, and frankly offensive to me that anyone would take such a rumor seriously when the Faith is my own. It’s a religion, people - tell me one reason a religious Faith would need a social network like Facebook to further its mission. Do you seriously believe any religion would be so stupid as to try this? People would leave Facebook in droves if that were to happen, and a network like Facebook has no good way of building up the members of the Faith itself. The claim is absolutely ridiculous, and I can’t believe established bloggers are taking this serious enough to share with others! There seems to be a serious lack of understanding between the blogosphere and the LDS Faith and I’d like to figure out a way to put an end to it.

Let’s go back to earlier this year. You may remember my “Shame on You TechCrunch” post I wrote awhile back, calling out the writers at CrunchGear for an extremely biased, and very misunderstood and inconsiderate interview of Penn Juliette, in which he claimed Mormons had “magic underwear” (as a Mormon, I affirm to you, that my underwear is not magic), and went on to encourage him as he talked about how easy religious women were, degrading women at the same time. While I still will not read CrunchGear because of that, I have lifted my boycott of TechCrunch (just because there is no way to avoid it - I also did not know Arrington at all at the time), but as you can see, there is a blatent misunderstanding of the LDS Faith in the blogosphere. CrunchGear still stands by their article and has refused to make any statement to the contrary.

Now, to give credit to those that have blogged about this today, Eric Eldon (of VentureBeat) does have a great point in that the LDS Church does actively invest in stock to retain and increase the value of its members donations through Tithing, and Facebook employees are selling stock. Like Louis Gray, I too give 10% of my wages in the form of Tithing to the Church, and I sincerely hope they invest it wisely and don’t just waste it away. I know their investments are wise though, and even the “widow’s mite” is considered and cared for. The Church itself never publishes these investments and it would be impossible to know if some are in Facebook or some are in Microsoft or some are in Google. They take these donations as sacred, and every effort is taken to maintain the sacredness of those donations. However, an outright acquisition of Facebook would be proposterous and completely out of line with the Church’s history.

Every one of these bloggers could have done a simple Tweet in fact, and quickly gotten a response from Mormons on how ridiculous the claims are. Or they could have shot Louis Gray, or me, or Matt Asay, or Phil Windley, or other Mormon bloggers an e-mail asking us if the claims were true. It took me about 5-10 minutes to send an e-mail to the LDS church and get a response back (which, btw, said the claims are not true and unfounded), and in fact, the LDS Church CIO is even on Twitter - an e-mail or even simple dm to him may have done the trick.

Now, I’m not necessarily trying to call out these specific bloggers, but rather point out the problem in general - I respect most of them in fact and really enjoy their regular blog posts. I’m just trying to make a shoutout to the blogosphere that we’re here if you have questions! Let’s start an open dialogue about the Mormon Faith - do you have questions? We’d really like to answer them before you assume and blog inaccuracies in the first place. Please, don’t hesitate to contact me, Louis Gray, or any other Mormon blogger if you have any hestitancy before posting an article. It’s time we put an end to this nonsense, once and for all.

Share This

by Jesse Stay at 7:05 AM under acquisitions , blogging , facebook , lds , mormon , new media , oss , religion , rumors , social media (Comments)

Hans Fugal
no nic

» New FamilySearch

So I finally got around to trying out the "New FamilySearch" today. I am both impressed and disappointed.

First the good parts. NFS (you didn't think I was going to type "New FamilySearch" over and over, did you?) has an impressive goal and paradigm. The goal is to create one hugemongous centralized database for all church members. The idea is to get away from the half dozen church databases (Ancestral File, IGI, etc.), and the half gazillion individual databases. A noble goal but a very scary one. It would be easy to screw this up and make a bigger mess than that with which we started. In fact this is why I have been reluctant to check it out—I didn't want to be disappointed and I wholly expected to be.

Well, they actually pull it off quite well. The new paradigm is to keep everything and to promote recording evidence. In short, genealogy done right. When you merge a person, that is recorded and available for others to see. When you want to change information, you don't change it directly (as you would in a conclusion-based program like PAF), but instead you "add an opinion" complete with sources and/or notes. If you think that a piece of information is wrong and you have evidence against it, you can dispute it (again, giving source and notes). The old "wrong" information isn't eliminated, but it is marked as disputed. The changes and choices you make about people show up in the pedigree chart etc. This is multi-user genealogy done well (I might call it "distributed genealogy", but I'll reserve that term for something better, as you'll see later).

From the perspective of an LDS member this is a fantastic system. When ordinances are performed in the temple they are immediately reflected in the database. When you want to do temple work for so-and-so, you state your intentions in the system and print out a page to take to the temple with you. If anyone else tried to do the same work, they'd see it was in process. This will drastically reduce—perhaps even essentially eliminate—duplicated effort in the temple. I have to say it's about time. It would have been cool 10 years ago. It was expected 7 years ago. Now it's finally here.

There are some other cool tidbits, too, like the pedigree view which combines couples to make better use of space (are they the first to think of it? Probably not, though I haven't personally seen this approach before):

NFS pedigree

There's an info box at the bottom with different tabs, one of which is "possible duplicates". I much much much prefer working with duplicates in this manner, rather than a global "match and merge". Very nice. There are also time lines and Google Maps integration (see where your ancestor was born, married, died, etc.). And those little temple icons unobtrusively notify you of potential temple work to do (or that has already been done). Overall they make nice use of AJAX, too.

But there's problems. Big problems.

It's slow. Painfully slow. It's slow enough to be a real pain for doing actual genealogical work. Maybe people with limited computer skills wouldn't find it slow, because it moves at about the pace they can keep up with. But for those of us in the computer age (read: almost everyone in my generation or younger) it is painful and restrictive. Why is it slow? Because it's a web app. News flash! Even AJAX web apps are slow.

Ok, it's slow. No big deal, right? Just download the GEDCOM, do your research, and upload the changes. Right? I have news for you. There's no exporting data from NFS. The help center has this to say:

Exporting Information from FamilySearch for Use in Your Personal Computer

This topic describes how to get information from FamilySearch into your family history computer program.

If you find information in FamilySearch that you do not have, you will need to either use the cut and paste features of your operating system or retype it into your computer program.

Currently, FamilySearch does not support downloading information for use with Personal Ancestral File or similar computer programs. Family history computer programs may choose to support this feature when it becomes available from FamilySearch.

Really. Cut and paste! It is a big black hole waiting to consume your information and display it to you on its terms only. Its slow terms. You want to make a family pedigree website? Write a script to spit out all the place names of your ancestors so you can put blue dots on a map? Make a Google Maps mashup? Do any number of other useful things with a GEDCOM export, including actually be able to work with it at a reasonable speed, put it on your handheld for reference at the family history library? Print out reports? No way. Uh-uh. Remember how I avoided using the term "distributed genealogy"? It's like having your genealogy in a distributed revision control system like mercurial or git, but you can only access the one single repository with a web interface. You can't check out the code. You can't work offline. You can't use your own tools. You can't write emergent scripts. You're screwed.

For understandable reasons, you can't see information on living people, and they don't show up as search results. You do get access to your own ancestors and descendents and your spouse, but apparently not your spouse's family, your siblings, or any information on living people (like your parents' birthdays, etc.). You can enter this information in, or upload it in a GEDCOM. But the first rule of genealogy is start with your 4 generations. If everyone starts with their 4 generations, but most of those people are still alive, then how much effort is duplicated? How many duplicate versions of my dad will there be? Well let's see, he has 11 siblings, various aunts and uncles who are into genealogy, 7 children (who should all see the same record, but might conceivably enter conflicting information). Not a huge problem, but an annoyance. Once you fill out the tree to the dead people (hint: upload a GEDCOM of what you already have here, but only those first couple generations), then you find and link the dead people into the tree, then you have a nice resource. So far, it's just a research resource—I wouldn't trust a lot of things further than I can throw them, but they make good research jumping-off points. Maybe eventually through the hard work of thousands it will converge to a respectable database, in the spirit of a wiki.

Also, it's presently restricted to LDS members (you need your membership number and confirmation date to register). The best genealogists I know aren't LDS. Certainly the bulk of decent genealogists I know aren't LDS. Most of the lousy genealogists I know are LDS. (Of course, that doesn't mean we have a monopoly on lousy genealogists, I just haven't had reason or opportunity to mingle with lousy non-LDS genealogists much). So this seems like a drawback across the board.

Maybe down the road (I think it's still beta, though they never use that word) it will allow GEDCOM export and be available to all genealogists. Maybe the speed issue will be addressed, or they'll come up with a desktop client. Maybe this will be the rockingest genealogy database ever. Or maybe it will be of marginal interest—a great way to prepare names for the temple and avoid duplicate temple work, but not a good tool for daily genealogical work. Time will tell.

I am impressed by the no-information-loss implementation. I'd like to propose taking it a step further. What if we could publish genealogical repositories on websites like we do with mercurial or git? What if we had the genealogical equivalent of github? What if you and all the other genealogists out there could, without information loss, match and merge and add information and correct information and unmerge faulty merges and… all without loss of information, the ability to go back in time (like you can with a revision control system), etc. A global genealogical database, a global record of genealogical discovery. Now, one huge database doesn't make a lot of sense. It'd be a pain to push and pull. So you'd have to be able to push and pull only pieces of the tree. And of course the merging, confidence, dispute, etc. aspects would have to be dealt with well (as they mostly are in NFS, though there would be unique challenges for it in a truly distributed genealogical system). Just imagine the potential. And feel free to expound on your imaginings in the comments.

by Hans Fugal at 12:00 AM under family , gedcom , genealogy , history , lds

Doran Barton
fozzmoo
Fozzolog

» Online religiousity

I taught at church today. I’m a member of the Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints and I was called by my ecclesiastical leaders to be a teacher, once of month, to the Elders Quorum (men 18 years old and older who haven’t been called to be in the High Priests group yet).

This year we are teaching from a new book the Church has produced called Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith which contains lessons taken from the recorded writings, sermons, etc. of the first prophet and president of the LDS Church: Joseph Smith.

This book is fascinating to me because the way Smith taught is different in many ways from how later and more contemporary leaders taught and teach today. I think this is partly because he had a big job on his shoulders: to convince people to join his new church and that the beliefs the religion is based on are grounded in truth.

Today’s lesson was on missionary work and sharing the gospel with others. I started a group discussion with the class about why members are reluctant to share their gospel beliefs with others in their life who are either less active members of the church or non-members. Lots of people responded saying it just has become increasingly inappropriate in today’s society to share such personal, sacred things with people, that we’re supposed to just accept other people’s beliefs regardless of what they are.

This is in contrast to the way Joseph Smith behaved. He relished the opportunity to speak to people about his beliefs. He encouraged missionary work among all members. He explains at one point that Christ died so that people can be saved, but only if they have the opportunity to learn of the Plan Of Salvation. That’s where church members come in: Sharing the knowledge of the Plan Of Salvation with those who haven’t yet had that opportunity.

To close up the lesson, I read from Elder Russell M. Ballard’s talk in December 2007 in which he talks specifically about using New Media to Support the Work of the Church and encourages members to write about their religion, their beliefs in their blogs, to participate in online discussion forums social networking communities, to comment on online news stories that may misrepresent the beliefs of the LDS Church, etc.

Having not really written much of a religious nature on the Fozzolog, I thought I would give it a shot.

7:32 AM under blogging , lds , relgion , religion , social networking

Jesse Stay
obfuscated, Uncle_Jesse
Stay N' Alive » OSS

» The Mormon Church/Wikileaks Fiasco (or not-so-fiasco), A Mormon’s Perspective

Note that I’m not going to provide any links to the mentioned content here - you can go research yourself. Unlike Wikileaks, I respect others’ copyright.

One thing you may notice on this blog is that while I rarely pipe in with religious thoughts and my own personal religious beliefs (although I used to quite often), I will not hesitate to step in when a Social Media-related religious event occurs. An interesting Groundswell is happening today between the Headquarters of my Faith, and the controversial anonymous sharing site, Wikileaks. However, I don’t think it’s occurring in the way people think it is.

This morning on Slashdot you may have seen an article about the Mormon Church (or “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints“, which is the Official name of the Church) sending a Cease and Desist to Wikileaks for posting links to a Copyrighted, yet old version (1999) of the Church’s “General Handbook of Instructions” for others to freely download.

I don’t understand why this is news. Having been in LDS Bishoprics before as a Clerk and Executive Secretary, I am very familiar with this manual. It is simply a guide for leaders of the Church to know how to council and guide members of the Church, and according to my understanding, NOT (fully) DOCTRINE. It is simply a Policy manual, and while Bishops and other Leaders of the church may follow its council, in the end they are left up to their own judgement (encouraged by the Church “to follow the promptings of the Spirit”) to decide how to handle matters in the Church. The Church considers the Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Perl of Great Price to be the Official Doctrine of the Church.

The Mormon Church is simply requesting Wikileaks remove the content because it is their own IP, not Wikileaks, and they are removing it as they would any other Church-owned and copyrighted document. Wikileaks and other sites are also portraying the contents of the manual as though it is doctrine for the general membership of the Mormon church, when in reality it was only intended as a guide for Leaders in the first place. The Mormon church has to protect the dissemination of false information as well.

In Charlene Li’s and Josh Bernoff’s book, Groundswell, she starts out with an example that happened last year on Digg.com where a user shared a blog post about how the HD-DVD Encryption standard had been broken. AACS LA quickly sent a cease and desist to Digg.com and the Digg.com founders promptly removed the link. Before Digg knew it, their own users began to backlash against them, occupying the entire front page of Digg with copies of the HD DVD encryption algorithm. Digg had a Groundswell of its own between its own users and it knew it had to do something. What did they do? They listened to their users and put the link back up, stating they would go down fighting rather than ignore their users.

I think with the post on SlashDot this morning some people may be thinking (and some hoping) a similar Groundswell is going to occur with the Mormon Church. Those that think so will be pleasantly surprised - there’s a difference between a Groundswell of your own members and those outside of your membership talking about you. How do you handle a Groundswell of people outside of your customer-base/user-base/member-base? You get in the conversation!

I want to share with you a video from Elder Russell M. Ballard, a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Quorum of 12 Apostles - religious or not, I’d like to encourage you to read this not just from a religious perspective, but also a business perspective and how you can disseminate correct information about your business:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is getting in the Groundswell through its own members. They encourage their members to blog, Twitter, get on Facebook, and clarify misconceptions. The Mormon Church will overcome this Groundswell (if you can even call it one) via its own membership, correcting misinformation Socially rather than through news releases and other means and letting the general media and blogosphere say what it believes. They have a Youtube channel here. They are on Twitter. They have a Facebook Page.

I encourage other churches and even businesses to take this response - there is a lot that can be applied from a religious, or even non-religious perspective from this. When you get your own followers of any business, brand, or religion to spread correct information about your brand it can overcome any misinformation spread about it.

Wikileaks is wrong in this case - they are sharing copyrighted information, not owned by themselves, and without the permission of the owner. The LDS Church isn’t going after them because the shared links are “secret”, but rather it is copyrighted material, and Wikileaks does not have permission to share it! As a book author and software developer I don’t want people using my content without my permission (which I’m generally pretty relaxed on in my personally owned content). Why would I want Wikileaks sharing the content I personally own on their site let alone others?

Share This

by Jesse Stay at 10:27 PM under blogging , changing the world , facebook , general handbook of instructions , latter-day saint , lds , mormon , opensocial , oss , religion , social media , social network optimization , the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints , twitter , wikileaks (Comments)

Hans Fugal
no nic

» Grab Conference with Hpricot

So you slept through a few sessions of conference (or you were distracted by the computer or stuck in the bathroom with a potty training toddler). The natural thing to do is to listen to sessions one at a time on your mp3 player over the next week or two. But it would be too much work to go to the archives website every day to download the appropriate session, then sync your mp3 player. No, you need to download them all now. But clicking on each one is tedious at best.

Enter a script. Now I've done something like this in the past with just sed and grep, but this time I thought I'd skip the sed trial and error and practice some Hpricot. It was quick and painless:

require 'rubygems'
require 'hpricot'
require 'open-uri'
CONFERENCE_URL="http://www.lds.org/conference/sessions/display/0,5239,49-1-851,00.html"
doc = Hpricot(open(CONFERENCE_URL))
puts (doc/"a").map{|a| a['href']}.join("\n")

That little script extracts all the urls from a URL. Well maybe there's a program that does that already. Maybe it's urlview, but an impatient google didn't find it in time (and urlview isn't installed on my laptop). Now you continue on with the grep magic:

./strip_urls.rb | grep mp3 | grep -v Complete | xargs wget

And you're on your way.

by Hans Fugal at 1:43 PM under hpricot , lds , ruby , scraping

Jesse Stay
obfuscated, Uncle_Jesse
Stay N' Alive » OSS

» A Very Different Generation

I mentioned previously about the death of the Mormon President, Gordon B. Hinckley. What I found fascinating was the response on sites like Twitter and Facebook to his death. Gordon B. Hinckley is the President of the LDS church that truly brought the church into the 21st century. Yesterday was his funeral, and as a token, I thought I would post this image, showing the true devotion, through avenues like Facebook, those in and out of Mormon communities have for this man (note only one non-GBH feed item at this point in time). I think this shows as a tribute to where Gordon B. Hinckley has brought the LDS church in this century:

On a related note, you can follow live here to find out who the next President/Prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints will be, tomorrow at 11am.

Share this article with a friend...

Gregarious FeedFlare

by Jesse Stay at 7:51 AM under facebook , facebook news , facebook spread , gbh , gordon b. hinckley , gordon b. hinckley facebook , hinckley , lds , mormon , oss , president mormon church , religion , social media , social network optimization (sno) (Comments)

Stephen Shaw
no nic
Decriptor's Blog

» Glenn Beck’s Tribute to Gordon B. Hinckley

I was sent this link to a tribute from Glenn Beck to Gordon B. Hinckley.

Update:
Sorry the embedded youtube stuff was just messing things up

by sshaw at 5:36 PM under blog , gordon_b_hinckley , lds , mormon (Comments)

Jordan Gunderson
jordy
Jordy Blog

» A Prophet has Passed

A Prophet of God President Gordon B. Hinckley, fifteenth president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints passed away today.

President Hinckley was a noble and honorable man who spent his life in service of God and all mankind. I love and revere him for his example, his faith, his humility, his kindness, and his decency.

I consider President Hinckley a prophet of God and join his family and millions around the world in mourning his loss and celebrating his lifetime of service. There are too few real heroes in this world, but Gordon Bitner Hinckley was one of them. God bless President Hinckley!

by Jordy at 5:02 AM under decency , example , faith , gordon b. hinckley , heroes , lds , modern prophets , mormonism , service (Comments)

Stephen Shaw
no nic
Decriptor's Blog

» A Great Loss

I’ll leave the details to the link I’ll provide, but The President, Gordon B. Hinckley of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints passed away this evening at the age of 97. He was a remarkable person. Here is the link.

by sshaw at 4:44 AM under blog , gordon b. hinckley , lds , mormons (Comments)

Doran Barton
fozzmoo
Fozzolog

» Being especially thankful

Tomorrow is Thanksgiving and I'm not sure I've ever felt so obligated to feel thankful for everything in my life as I do this year. What better way to express this than by posting a long-ass entry in my blog, right?

(Or, as our friends over at xkcd would say: "a long ass-entry".)

So, I've been creating a list in my head of things I'm thankful for, in no particular order.

I'm thankful to Robb Kunz at KnowledgeBlue for believing in the value Iodynamics could bring to his company and absorbing us so we can work together toward a common goal. It hasn't been the easiest thing for me to do, having been "my own boss" pretty much since 2003, but it has been a tremendous learning experience and II've tried very hard to keep looking at it as such.

I'm thankful to Thom, Adam, and Mike -- my colleagues and friends that shared the experience of running Iodynamics with me. They work alongside me now at KnowledgeBlue and I value their friendship, talents, and zeal. I'm also thankful to Stephen for working with us at Iodynamics. I'm glad we were able to teach him a lot of neat stuff and become great friends before he went off to teach for Guru Labs.

Dave and Chadd were instrumental along the way in making Iodynamics what it became, so I am very thankful for their contributions and for their friendship, which continues to this day despite the fact we no longer work together or see each other very often.

Where would I be today without Linus Torvalds and the open source community? I can't imagine where I would be. While I was a Unix person for a few years before Linux hit the scene, I didn't turn my back on the world of living under Bill Gates' thumb until Red Hat Linux was released. It's been about ten years now that I've been running Linux as my primary desktop operating system and twelve years I've been running it on servers as part of my jobs. While I would undoubtably still be doing something with computers had Linux not existed, I woudln't have been able to do the very cool things I've done and it woudln't have been as fun or as productive. Linux and open source software just rocks!

Before we leave the topic of Linux and the open source community, I want to shout out to some local folks that I'm very grateful for. Clint, for following through with the creation of the Utah Open Source Conference and the Utah Open Source Foundation and realizing a vision of a regional community of open source enthusiasts and supporters. Jayce, for his constant friendship and leadership.

I also can't go onto the next topic without expressing my thanks for the IRC community from the #utah channel on Freenode.net. The comradery and friendship I've enjoyed from #utah has been a great joy to me over the years. This has got to be perhaps one of the most fun, considerate, and polite groups of geeks I've had the opportunity to hang out with online in all my years on the Net.

I am very grateful to my church -- the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints -- and my local church leaders. I have been very standoffish in my participation in my religion for most of my life until this last year. While I'm still not a social butterfly as far as that is concerned, I have come to gain a much-needed new appreciation for the value of service to my fellow man during this last year. This began in April when I spent the entire day volunteering on Temple Square in Salt Lake City during the Spring session of General Conference. I was helping to direct vehicle and pedestrian traffic and over the course of the day, I saw thousands of fellow church members going to and from conference meetings and strolling about on the grounds of Temple Square. I came away from this experience with one very distinct impression: We are a beautiful people! I'm not just saying that because I saw a lot of pretty women (I did), but because just about everyone I saw was glowing, not just with happiness, but with a wonderful purpose. It was a subtle reminder that we're all in this life together and I can't think of a better group of people to be traveling through this life with.

I am thankful, of course, to my parents and my siblings. As I have grown older, I have realized two things: They are far from perfect; They are wonderful, good people. My mom and dad have been wonderful role models of service. Both of them are a lot more comfortable dealing with people than I am and it encourages me to get out of my shell. Many reading this may not know that my dad was a Utah state senator for twelve years when I was growing up. During that time, he worked hard to support the passage of bills that promoted conservative policies that were pro-Free Enterprise and personal responsibility. When I think back of some of the stupid ideas I had when I was younger and how tolerant my dad was of my misguided beliefs, it only increases my respect for him.

A couple years ago, I enjoyed listening to Jerry Doyle on the radio. He's a pretty cool guy, used to work as a Hollywood actor and now broadcasts his syndicated conservative talk radio program out of Las Vegas. His affiliate in Salt Lake removed his show and I was ticked off. I think they replaced him with Michael Savage who is angry, bitter, crotchety and not very satifying to listen to unless you are also angry, bitter, and crotchety. I wrote to the radio station to complain and, of course, got absolutely no response back. A few weeks later, my brother-in-law, Adam, asked me what I thought of this new guy they put in the afternoon spot Jerry Doyle used to occupy. I hadn't heard him, but I was happy they got rid of Michael Savage. Adam told me this guy was really funny, did a good show, and his name was Glenn Beck.

I gave Glenn a listen and was hooked immediately. In early 2006, I let my Rush Limbaugh 24/7 subscription expire and became a Glenn Beck Insider and a regular listener. It was also in 2006 that Glenn started up his TV show on CNN's Headline News and I was there from Day 1... even though the first episode really sucked. There were only about five of us that "got it."

Glenn's political philosophy mirrors mine almost perfectly and his re-embracing of religion in middle age is entirely relateable to me. His honesty, humility and sarcasm are refreshing. If I ever meet him in person, I'll probably bawl my head off.

In April of this year, right after radio personality Don Imus was fired for making a racial slur on the air, Glenn complained about the political correctness of the move without apologizing for Don Imus's comments. There was some talk of other prominent radio personalities like Glenn being taken off the air because their comments could be offensive to some people. Glenn took an extended vacation beginning April 16 but before he left, he appealed to his audience for more voices, not less. As he signed off he said, "You have your voice and others will start losing their voice if you don't start using yours."

I remember these words had a profound effect on me. I don't have a radio program, but I do have a couple ways of sharing thoughts with other people. One is this blog. Another is video. I decided I would work on creating my own brand of education and opinion through my blog and through my own video productions online. Thus, Solitary World was born. I haven't done much with it yet; Still trying to feel it out and find the best approach. I don't even know if it will be political, but it may be. We'll see.

I am very thankful to Glenn Beck... for everything he is and everything he does. Thanks, man.

Finally, there's my wife and kids. Sure, Glenn Beck is a nice guy and all, but if there was one person in this world who is singlehandedly responsible for me becoming a better person over the last decade or so, it's my wife. Her support (and tolerance) of me seems to have no boundaries. I don't know where I would be without her. I know it wouldn't be quite as nice as it is here.

My kids are wonderful and I can't be thankful enough for what the experience of being their earthly father has brought into my life. They are the most precious part of my life and I thorougly enjoy teaching them, guiding them, and helping them grow up.

If you've made it this far without falling asleep or bashing your computer into pieces, then have a Happy Thanksgiving!

12:24 AM under conservativism , family , general , glenn beck , lds , linux , open source software , religion , thanksgiving

Utah Open Source Planet

Utah Open Source Planet

What people talk about